In United States ex rel. Schneider v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat’l Ass’n [1], the D.C. Circuit re-affirms its position that contingent penalties are not obligations under the False Claims Act (“FCA”). BACKGROUND In the initial suit[2], Relator brought a qui tam action under the FCA against mortgage loan servicer JPMorgan Chase (“Chase”), alleging, in part,…Read More
The D.C. Circuit Draws the Line at “Potential” Penalties Being Considered Obligations Under the False Claims Act
Posted on January 22, 2018 in False Claims Act Defense
Published by: Hall Render