The Indiana Court of Appeals (the “Court”) upheld the trial court’s Order for Regular Commitment because sufficient evidence supported the finding that the patient, B.C., was both dangerous and gravely disabled. In re: the Civil Commitment of B.C., No. 25A-MH-303, 266 N.E.3d 304 (Ind. Ct. App. 2025). Background B.C., diagnosed with schizophrenia, was incarcerated... READ MORE
Indiana Court of Appeals Holds Repeated Threats and Disorientation Establish Dangerousness and Grave Disability
Posted on November 17, 2025 in Litigation Analysis, Mental Health
Published by: Hall Render
