[02/19/15]
Posted on February 19, 2015 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
Written by David B. Honig and Delphine P. O’Rourke Assertion of affirmative defenses creates risk for clients, attorneys and law firms. Treating False Claims Act litigation like any other litigation will lead to the unnecessary expenditure of time and money and potentially sanctions. A recent decision out of the Southern District of Texas, United States ex rel. King v Solvay S.A.,¹ is an excellent primer... READ MORE
Tags: affirmative defenses, comparative fault, contributory fault, Damages, failure to mitigate, False Claims Act, FCA, laches, learned intermediary, mitigation, third parties, unclean hands
[02/16/15]
Posted on February 16, 2015 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
by David B. Honig and Brian C. Betner CMS Announces Further Delay of Repayment Rule To be published in the February 17, 2015 Federal Register, CMS has extended its deadline for finalizing the Affordable Care Act’s (“ACA”) 60-day payback rule. This is the rule that requires a Medicare or Medicaid provider to return an identified overpayment within... READ MORE
Tags: cms, False Claims Act, regulation, retained overpayment, Reverse False Claims
[02/11/15]
Posted on February 11, 2015 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
Written by David B. Honig and Ritu Kaur Cooper. On February 3, 2015, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that disclosures to the public officials responsible for managing the subject of a False Claims Act lawsuit did not qualify as “public disclosures” for the purpose of the FCA’s public disclosure bar. US ex rel. Wilson v.... READ MORE
Tags: Audit, Bank of Farmington, compliance, David B. Honig, False Claims Act, FCA, Graham County, original source, public disclosure, qui tam, Rita Kaur Cooper, self-disclosure, whistleblower
[02/05/15]
Posted on February 5, 2015 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
with Drew B. Howk On Monday, February 2, well-respected Federal District Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff awarded costs to the prevailing Defendant in US ex rel. Associates Against Outlier Fraud v. Huron Consulting, Case No. 09 Civ. 1800(JSR). The case had a long history. The Complaint was originally filed in February 2009. It was unsealed ten months... READ MORE
Tags: costs, expenses, False Claims Act, FCA, fees, Huron Consulting, Rakoff
[02/03/15]
Posted on February 3, 2015 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
Written by David B. Honig and Steven H. Pratt. On February 2, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a case from the Southern District of Ohio, US ex rel American Systems Consulting, Inc. v Mantech Advanced Systems International. At issue was whether a court may determine whether a knowingly false statement in a proposal for... READ MORE
Tags: Colorado, DITCO, False Claims Act, FCA, healthcare, ManTech, materiality, medicaid, Medicare, RFP
[11/13/14]
Posted on November 13, 2014 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
Relator Thulin was a pharmacist in Idaho working for Shopko, a Wisconsin company. He filed an FCA claim alleging Shopko defrauded Medicaid by failing to pass along private insurance plan prices to Medicaid for dual-eligible patients. The court rejected Shopko’s claim, affirming the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss. Dual-eligible Medicaid recipients... READ MORE
Tags: assignment, False Claims Act, FCA, medicaid, pharmacy, Shopko, Thulin
[11/03/14]
Posted on November 3, 2014 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
Last week, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its unpublished ruling in US ex rel. Mastej v. Health Management Associates, Inc. At issue was whether the relator’s Third Amended Complaint adequately pled fraud with particularity, as required by Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 9(b). Mastej was an Health Management Associate (“HMA”) executive from 2001 to February 2007. In that... READ MORE
Tags: 11th Circuit, 9(b), AKS, Anti-Kickback, Eleventh Circuit, False Claims Act, FCA, fraud with particularity, Health Management Systems, hms, Mastej, Stark
[10/17/14]
Posted on October 17, 2014 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
In a new case from the Southern District of Ohio, US_v_MillenniumRadiology, the court denied a motion to dismiss a False Claims Act suit, finding that compliance with a safe harbor could only be raised on summary judgment. The court also found that uncompensated service as a medical director could form the basis for a False Claims... READ MORE
Tags: AKS, Anti-Kickback Statute, False Claims Act, FCA, hospital, medical director, radiology, Safe Harbor
[10/14/14]
Posted on October 14, 2014 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
From October 1 through October 12, 2014, there were 14 federal cases reported that mentioned the False Claims Act. One was previously discussed in the September 2014 FCA Update. Eight more only tangentially discussed the False Claims Act. Five cases might be of interest to parties and counsel in a False Claims Act suit. US... READ MORE
Tags: attorney, Boeing, Cephalon, Cestra, conspiracy, deposition, FAA, False Claims Act, FCA, first to file, fraud with particularity, Graves, individual defendants, jurisdiction, Kelly, May, Plaza Medical Centers, Privilege, Purdue Pharma, regulatory compliance, Serco, Smith, specific claims
[10/12/14]
Posted on October 12, 2014 in False Claims Act Defense
Written by: David B. Honig
Only one FCA case of interest was decided by a U.S. Circuit Court in September. In US ex rel Parikh v Brown, the Court found that a county hospital and its administrator’s participation in a “simple, brazen kickback scheme” could not be shielded by qualified immunity. The hospital and its administrator split pain center revenues with... READ MORE
Tags: AKS, Anti-Kickback, Brown, False Claims Act, FCA, Fifth Circuit, Parikh, qualified immunity, Stark