Articles and Blogs

The Indiana Court of Appeals (the “Court”) affirmed the trial court’s order for a temporary commitment which authorized forcibly medicating the patient. The Court held that the hospital presented clear and convincing evidence, primarily through detailed physician testimony, that both commitment and involuntary medication are appropriate. In re Commitment of L.F., No. 26A-MH-658, 2026... READ MORE

No contract, no problem—at least for now. An Illinois district court (the “Court”) opened the door for hospitals to recover underpaid claims from insurers—holding that a quantum meruit claim may proceed even absent any contract. Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hosp. v. Health Care Servs. Corp., 2026 WL 278804, No. 25-cv-04533, at *1 (N.D. Ill.... READ MORE

In a recent decision, the Indiana Court of Appeals (the “Court”) upheld a trial court’s Order for Temporary Commitment and affirmed a new mootness standard for civil commitment appeals. In re Commitment of J.F., 266 N.E.3d 268 (Ind. Ct. App. 2025). Background The Indiana Court of Appeals reaffirmed its standard for what evidence is... READ MORE

The Indiana Supreme Court (the “Court”) upheld a trial court’s Order for Temporary Commitment, reaffirming the new mootness standard for temporary civil commitment appeals first established earlier this year in In re Commitment of J.F., 256 N.E.3d 1260 (Ind. 2025). In re Commitment of M.C., 262 N.E.3d 836 (Ind. 2025). Background In J.F., the Court... READ MORE

In a recent decision, the Indiana Court of Appeals (the “Court”) upheld the trial court’s Order for Temporary Commitment, clarifying that a finding of “dangerousness” for civil commitment is not negated by claims of self-defense when the underlying conduct is driven by delusional beliefs. In re Commitment of J.S., No. 25A-MH-979, 263 N.E.3d 165... READ MORE

The Indiana Court of Appeals (the “Court”) upheld the trial court’s Order for Regular Commitment because sufficient evidence supported the finding that the patient, B.C., was both dangerous and gravely disabled. In re: the Civil Commitment of B.C., No. 25A-MH-303, 266 N.E.3d 304 (Ind. Ct. App. 2025). Background B.C., diagnosed with schizophrenia, was incarcerated... READ MORE

The Indiana Court of Appeals (the “Court”) affirmed a trial court’s order for a regular involuntary commitment, holding that when clear and convincing evidence shows treatment would likely extend past 90 days, regular commitment is appropriate. In re Commitment of D.W., No. 24A-MH-2284 (Ind. Ct. App., May 30, 2025). Background D.W., 46, voluntarily presented... READ MORE

In Humana Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the District Court for the Middle District of Florida (the “Court”) dismissed claims brought by Humana under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA and a few specialty pharmacies (collectively, “Teva”). The Court ruled that Humana lacked standing to sue due... READ MORE

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (“Fourth Circuit”) recently heard oral arguments in National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education v. Donald Trump (“NADOHE v. Trump”), a case challenging the constitutionality of certain aspects of President Trump’s anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”) executive orders, including Executive Order 14151, Ending Radical and Wasteful Government... READ MORE

In United States ex rel. O’Laughlin v. Radiation Therapy Services, P.S.C., the Sixth Circuit (also referred to as the “Court”) recently affirmed dismissal of a relator’s False Claims Act (“FCA”) action, concluding that he failed to plead or prove with particularity that radiation service providers submitted false claims for radiation or chemotherapy services, relying... READ MORE