[03/14/13]
Posted on March 14, 2013 in Litigation Analysis
Written by: David B. Honig
If you or your business accepted payment via Visa or MasterCard between January 1, 2004 and November 28, 2012, you may be eligible for a cash award as a result of a pending class action lawsuit. Additionally, you may be approached by consultants who will offer to register you for participation in exchange for... READ MORE
[01/24/13]
Posted on January 24, 2013 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
A recent Court of Appeals of Indiana decision limits future defendants from using Indiana’s Medical Malpractice Act’s statute of limitations to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims. If a plaintiff sends her complaint to the Indiana Department of Insurance within the two-year statute of limitations, but fails to provide the fee until after the two-year window has... READ MORE
[01/15/13]
Posted on January 15, 2013 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On January 15, 2013, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a 5-0 opinion authored by Justice Robert Rucker in Plank vs. Community Hospital affirming the trial court’s denial of Plank’s request for an evidentiary hearing to challenge the constitutionality of the Medical Malpractice Act concluding that Plank had forfeited his opportunity to conduct such a... READ MORE
[12/21/12]
Posted on December 21, 2012 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On December 12, 2012, the Indiana Supreme Court issued four opinions related to the broad discretion of the trial court in awarding prejudgment interest. In Indiana, the Tort Prejudgment Interest Statute (“TPIS”) (or IC § 34-51-4-1 et. seq.), was enacted to “encourage settlement and to compensate the Plaintiff for the lost time value of... READ MORE
[12/10/12]
Posted on December 10, 2012 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
Historically, plaintiffs and defendants in personal injury actions have agreed that the value of the plaintiff’s claim is largely driven by the value of the medical expenses incurred by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s alleged negligence, with higher costs resulting in higher values for the plaintiff’s claim and vice versa. As... READ MORE
[12/04/12]
Posted on December 4, 2012 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On November 16, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan released an 80 page opinion granting Summary Judgment in favor of St. Mary Mercy Hospital in the case Brintley v. St. Mary Mercy et al (No. 09-cv-14014). The plaintiff was a former physician at St. Mary Mercy who had... READ MORE
[10/24/12]
Posted on October 24, 2012 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On September 19, 2012, the Indiana Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Columbus Regional Hospital vs. Clyde Amburgey. The Court allowed plaintiff to proceed against the Hospital for the actions of physicians on staff as apparent agents even though the physicians were not named in the lawsuit. The court found a material issue... READ MORE
[09/07/12]
Posted on September 7, 2012 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On August 10, 2012, the Indiana Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Houser v. Kaufman and held that a woman could continue her claim against the physician who delivered her 35 years before she filed her claim. Stacy Kaufman filed a proposed medical malpractice claim against the estate of anonymous physician Dr. K... READ MORE
[08/27/12]
Posted on August 27, 2012 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On August 15, 2012, the Indiana Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Curts v. Miller’s Merry Manor. For the first time, the Court of Appeals held that nurses could be qualified as an expert witness under Indiana Evidence Rule 702 and could offer an expert opinion as to whether an alleged breach caused... READ MORE
[08/24/12]
Posted on August 24, 2012 in Litigation Analysis
Written by: VanLaan, P. Peter
Last month, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an unpublished opinion granting a health care maintenance organization statutory immunity under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (“HCQIA”) after terminating a physician’s contract. In Moore v John Deere Health Care Plan, Inc., John Deere terminated the contract of Dr. Moore after receiving numerous quality... READ MORE